The lie.
Dear Wonderland readers: there's a new post up.
Tonight, after dinner with my parents, we all settled down to watch the tape of Melissa stomping on Meredith Viera's head. And by that I mean "Melissa showing remarkable taste and restraint in not stomping on Meredith Viera's head." (As Henry likes to say when he utters something nonsensical, that’s what it means in my world.)
I was all set to give you the full commentary from the Bradleys, because they're known for their amusing commentary, but mostly there was puzzled silence, along with some sighing and head-shaking. (Also, whenever Meredith said Janet Taylor's name, my mom would say, "Wait, did I hear that right? Genitalia? Is Genitalia really her name?" and “Well, her name is Genitalia—there’s her problem.")
And right now I feel mostly the same way about the show: puzzled and weary (if eager to mock Janet Taylor). On Friday morning, as I sat in the green room, watching Melissa more than hold her own against the bullshit, I was completely unsurprised at how events were transpiring. My expectations had already been rock-bottom. I knew the piece would be slanted against Melissa and her booze-loving ilk from the start. But at least she sounded good. And she looked good. And that, I thought, was enough.
But all weekend, I felt vaguely sick about it: both about the segment, and my own apathy. You know, it sucks that we're trained to expect so little. An issue is raised, and instead of meaningful debate, we get a condescending, judgmental puff piece designed only to incite public disapproval. It's meaningless and shallow and dispiriting. And not at all surprising.
It may not seem like a big deal, a short segment on whether moms should or shouldn't have a drink when they're with their kids. But behind it, behind the supposed concern about this new trend (quoth my mother: "Give me a break") is one message. It's the same one we get day after day. And it's simply this: we are not capable. Women are not capable. We need to be watched. We need to be told what to do. We must be monitored, judged, and corrected.
This message is so pervasive, we don't even hear it anymore. We just internalize it, and fret, and compare ourselves to everyone else, and point fingers at other mothers who we think are worse than we are. And then the media turns around and asks, why are mothers so neurotic?
It sucks, and I don't know what the solution is. It's difficult when you're lost in a funhouse to find the exit. Maybe we just point out the lie whenever and wherever we see it. It's not much, but it's a start. And maybe after that first step, maybe we'll know which way to go.










January 28, 2007
Reader Comments (69)
You're right, Alice - what is UP with the monitoring of women in society?
Hell, if the men would pitch in taking care of the kids more often, maybe the moms wouldn't "need" a drink!
Obviously, an excessive intake of alcohol is not good for anyone, especially someone who is responsible for taking care of a child. Why people have to take it to such extremes is beyond me.
Of course, I chose not to have kids, so I guess I can enjoy my nightly freebasing without any guilty feelings. *snort*
- M
The message from the cocktail playgroup set seems to be "being a mother is hard and I feel better when I have a drink". That seems to be what Taylor was responding to. It wasn't "sometimes when my girlfriends and I get together with the kids, we mix up a pitcher of mojitos." It was "I feel like selling my kid on Ebay so I get together with friends every week to throw back a cocktail and commiserate." Mmm.
Does this make me a sanctimommy?
Are we supposed to just support all of each other's choices because we're women and mothers? Life involves making a lot of choices for ourselves and our families, and we base those choices on our values, priorities, and beliefs. For me, someone who's depressed and anxious using drinking as a way to get through her week sends up a few red flags. But that's me.
I just saw the video on MSN.com, and was so horrified. I have a little news flash for Ms. Vieira and the rest of America: Moms do A LOT worse than have a glass of wine while their children are around. Some cook crystal meth. in the kitchen, some get falling-down, passed-out drunk, and others are having sex for money while they are supposed to be caring for their children. There's a loooooonnng continuum between stone-cold sobriety 24/7 and crack whore. Let's all get a grip and gain some perspective.
It's not just women, or moms. See also: racism, class issues, and the debate about "same-sex marriage"
We're all in this together. Madison Avenue taught us a long time ago if you present a message or an image to people long enough and often enough and dress it up in pretty colors and perhaps give it a theme song, it makes it accepted.
Whether it is right or not is totally irrelevant.
We do it to each other all. the. time.
And I can mess up my HTML. Ugh. Way to go, Ben.
I admit I am biased, as I live in Napa and wine flows freely at many events, including my neighborhood Friday afternoon playgroup. But we are having a drink to celebrate the end of the week and catch up with our friends while the kids play, not because we can't handle the kids for one more second without some alcohol. Hell, we even bring wine and hors d'oeuvres to the kids' soccer practice! (Best. Soccer. Team. Ever.)
Are we out of control? No. Not even close. One glass of wine does not make any of us bad parents.
Anyway--I am competent, I am a good parent, and I refuse to let the Today show make me think otherwise.
Personally, I despised the whole babysitter comparison. I think I chipped a tooth from gritting them together. Grrrrr.... There I go again. Damn.
See "Taking It All Off In Peoria"www.suburbankamikaze.typepad.com
Cheers!S.K.
You are right in so many of your comments.And yet...
You rail that women are our own worst enemies. And then you make fun of a well-spoken professional's name (Janet Taylor = Genitalia).
You rail that this debate was slanted from the start and then complain that Melissa got the short end of the stick. If one knew the rules were unfair, why choose to play? Didn't Melissa get a tiny something by appearing on the Today Show? A bit of fame for her blog, perhaps, which translates into ad revenue? Wouldn't it have been more powerful to say, "I pretty much know the type of segment The Today Show will produce on this topic, and I'm sorry, but I'm not interested." That would have shown true authority over the argument.
I actually agree that it's perfectly fine for a mom to have a glass of wine during the day. And I love your blog. But this time, I think you (and Melissa) protest too much.
And for what it's worth, if you really listen to Janet Taylor, what she says is the essence of women empowerment. She was all about working together and minimized her personal views on the subject, which happened to differ from Melissa's.
Call me naive, I've been called worse.
I certainly won't make the same mistake, but what Alice is talking about is a fair point. The message the Today Show played for us was one many women are tired of.
I'm not sure if we heard the same Janet Taylor on that show. She gave zero examples of her idea of 'women empowerment' and why deciding to have a glass of wine with friends was not empowering in it's own way. She mentioned women working together but never explained how she saw that happening.
I wasn't told I was to debate with a psychologist and I wasn't informed I would debate with a broken record which said nothing.